Tactical Support Service helps minimize pricey disruptions to your business that could be a consequence of a labor dispute. We have a proven good reputation for excellence in the industry, gained during twenty five years of expertise meeting the labor crisis security needs of more than 2,000 clients in america and Canada. Special Response Corporation teams and/or TeamWorks USA, Inc personnel may be deployed to your location with round the clock notice or less. Our security specialists are employees of Special Response Corporation, on stand by status, awaiting deployment.
Our teams include professional, disciplined and strike security companies with extensive police force or military experience, taught to meet your security needs. Labor Dispute/Strike Security Services offered include:
We now have worked with clients such industries as: aggregate, utility, energy, paper, manufacturing, distribution, warehousing, chemical, hospitality, grocery/retail, entertainment, media, healthcare, construction, pharmaceutical, waste haulers, telecommunications, defense contractors, and transportation.
Protecting one’s information against the threat of technical interception, or eavesdropping, is complicated by the variety of techniques, which an eavesdropper has at his disposal. If he or she is going to intercept the data, he may employ any or all combinations of threat techniques. The degree of his determination is going to be relying on the need for information (to him). The issues presented from the area in which the eavesdropper must operate may also influence the choice of threat techniques. Those items that limit the techniques at his disposal range from the physical standards and safeguards within the target area, their own capabilities and his awesome access to specialists that may broaden his capabilities.
In evaluating the technical interception threat, several questions must be answered. What is the worth of information towards the potential eavesdropper? This value, which may be totally different from the value towards the owner in the information, has a tendency to establish the threat level (the extent and expense to which the eavesdropper will go to get the details). Additionally, it establishes, at some level, the risk he will take to acquire the information. Obviously, if the details are of relatively low value, the eavesdropper will expend relatively little time and money and expose him/herself to hardly any risk.
Who constitutes the threat? This query is best answered by determining who may benefit from the interception. Based on who and what benefit may be determined, there is some grounds for an analysis of technical capability and probability that specialist is going to be employed.
What is the desired length of the interception? If the duration is short, (a two hour conference for instance) some interception techniques are definitely more convenient and apt to be used more than others. If the desired duration is an extended one (like continuous monitoring of the office), techniques requiring batteries within the target area are more inclined to be used.
Answering questions 1 through 3 could be relatively easy. The answer to question 4 normally requires expert evaluation of the specific problem area, when the evaluation will be accomplished in-depth. However, consideration in the data based on the above questions allows the non-specialist to help make a minimum of general threat evaluations.
Set aside an area solely for the usage of negotiating officials when discussing any part of the negotiations. Ideally, this room would be at the conclusion of a corridor, above ground level or in a basement area. (Rooms or suites inside a hotel can be adapted for this purpose.) Walls ought to be solid concrete block and extend from your true ceiling to the floor. In the event the room has connecting doors, both rooms needs to be designated as secure areas and controlled accordingly. If rooms with solid walls should not be acquired, irgbmh for controlling adjoining rooms should be made.
Examine the room(s) prior to initial use to insure there are no security weaknesses (speakers, vents, false walls, etc of listening devices, which will compromise your position. A physical and electronic examination of the area(s) is usually necessary over a recurring basis during negotiations. Secure the area before the examination and sustain the security posture throughout the entire period of negotiations. The other use of security disciplines ought to be put in effect through the use of: joint use security systems/security personnel, utilizing corporate personnel, off duty law enforcement officers or private security personnel. Insure that security personnel usually are not sympathetic to the opposing party. Change the lock(s), utilizing outside locksmith services, if practical. Institute a mandatory key control and access codes.